AdminBombay High Court has turned the spotlight on assisted reproductive technology (ART) as it questioned a childless couple about adopting donor gametes after the husband crossed the 55‑year age threshold set by the new ART Regulation Act. The court’s inquiry underscores the complex interplay between age limits, donor IVF, and rising demand for fertility solutions in India.
Background and Context
India’s Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (ART Act) introduced the first nationwide age limits for patients seeking IVF: 55 years for men and 50 for women. The legislation aims to curb age‑related health risks and ensure genetic and medical safety. While the rules principally target the parents, they also influence the use of donor sperm or eggs for couples whose ages exceed these thresholds.
The case, involving a Mumbai couple whose husband now aged 55, reflects a broader trend of older couples facing infertility challenges. According to the Association of Fertility Clinics in India, over 30% of women and 20% of men in the 40‑to‑55 age bracket use ART services.
Key Developments in the Court’s Questioning
Justice Riyaz Chagla and Justice Farhan Dubash, presiding over the matter, explicitly asked the couple to “make a proper, clear statement” regarding the use of sperm and egg donation. The central issue: whether a fresh IVF cycle begun after the age limit surpasses the regulations, and if donor gametes can bypass the rule.
“If they are going to commence a fresh process, whether the age limit will be applicable, that is the short point for consideration,” said counsel Jyoti Chavan.
The court referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling on surrogacy, which clarified that the age limit has a prospective effect. It does not retroactively invalidate ongoing gamete‑freezing procedures, but it does apply to new cycles initiated after the threshold. Counsel Nikhilesh Pote alluded to similar decisions from the Calcutta and Kerala High Courts where donor sperm usage was permissible under certain conditions.
In a notable twist, the court also probed whether the wife would consider using donor eggs. The couple’s earlier IVF attempts had involved a donor egg, leading the judge to request a definitive stance on both male and female donor options.
Impact Analysis on Parents and the Reproductive‑Tech Industry
For prospective parents, the ruling reinforces that age limits are binding and cannot be sidestepped by newly introduced donor gametes. Women aged 50‑55 or men above 55 will face stricter scrutiny and must seek case‑by‑case exemptions. Clinics, meanwhile, must ensure they counsel patients on these legal boundaries and maintain meticulous records.
- 🖥️ Data Tracking: Clinics must log donor source details, age at extraction, and consent forms in compliance with the ART Act.
- 🕒 Timing Thresholds: If gametes were frozen before the 2021 Act came into force, they can still be used under the retrospective rule, but new pregnancies initiated post-2022 require court approval.
- 💡 Germline Ethics: The public debate over donor IVF age limits also intensifies discussions about genetic screening and donor anonymity.
International students planning to study or work in India may be indirectly affected. Many overseas fertility clinics outsource gamete storage to Indian facilities; the age regulations imply that donor donations must be vetted against these limits to avoid legal complications.
Expert Insights and Practical Guidance
Dr. Sanjay Patel, a reproductive endocrinologist at Mumbai’s Institute of Advanced Fertility, advises:
“Couples over the age thresholds should consult a fertility specialist soon. Early gamete freezing before crossing the limit can create a legal window for future use. However, after the date, the only lawful path is via donor gametes under court supervision.”
Legal counsel advises following the court’s procedure to file any petition requesting an exemption. The petition must:
- Detail the medical history and prior IVF cycles.
- State unequivocally whether donor sperm or eggs will be employed.
- Include a written declaration of consent from both partners.
- Attach third‑party certification of age and health status.
For overseas patients, it’s crucial to verify that their clinics in India adhere to the ART Act and to obtain copies of the court‑approved order before proceeding. Agencies that facilitate cross‑border gamete transport must cite the court’s ruling to dispel any compliance queries.
Looking Ahead: Future Reproductive‑Tech Policy and Trends
In light of this case, policymakers might revisit the rationales behind the 55‑year male and 50‑year female thresholds. Some stakeholders propose a more flexible approach, arguing that advancements in reproductive medicine enable safe pregnancies beyond these ages. Nonetheless, the current regulation remains in effect until amended.
Clinics are expected to invest in robust compliance platforms that integrate court orders, donor chain data, and biometric verification. Artificial intelligence tools may soon predict pregnancy viability for older parents, potentially influencing future amendments.
Finally, the court’s insistence on clear statements regarding donor usage signals a move toward greater transparency. Patients must now proactively disclose their plans to avoid procedural delays and legal disputes.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
Admin